Why Being Scared on Purpose Feels Good (And Why Some People Hate It)

Researchers measured fear and enjoyment inside a haunted house. Enjoyment peaks at a middling amount of fear, then falls off at both ends.

Gizella Nagyne Palinkas

9/14/20267 min read

Enjoyment of fear follows an upside-down U: too little fear is boring, too much is unpleasant, and the pleasure sits in the narrow band between the two. That is not a metaphor — a team from Aarhus University strapped heart-rate monitors to 110 people walking through a commercial haunted house and found that self-reported enjoyment rose with self-reported fear up to a point, then fell again, a pattern the researchers described as a "sweet spot" (Andersen et al., Psychological Science, 2020).

Which reshapes the question. Almost nobody enjoys unlimited fear. What differs between the horror fan and the horror avoider is mostly where their sweet spot sits and how easily they can stay inside it.


The study that put numbers on it

In 2020, Marc Malmdorf Andersen, Uffe Schjoedt, Henry Price, Fernando E. Rosas, Coltan Scrivner and Mathias Clasen published a field study in Psychological Science called "Playing With Fear." Not a lab study: they ran it inside Dystopia Haunted House, a commercial attraction in Vejle, Denmark, built as 42 thematically connected rooms.

Visitors wore chest-strap heart-rate monitors for the whole route. Infrared cameras filmed them at three predetermined jump-scare locations, and two independent raters later coded their visible fear, surprise and enjoyment from that footage. Before and after, participants rated how frightened and how entertained they had felt, on ten-point scales.

The sample was 110 visitors, 62 of them women, with a mean age of 30.45 years and a range of 12 to 57. Eighteen were dropped for incomplete questionnaires or corrupted heart-rate traces, leaving 92 with usable physiological data

Two caveats before the findings. These were people who had chosen and paid to be there — a self-selected group, not the general public. And overall ratings were high on both counts: average enjoyment 6.95 (SD = 2.57), average fear intensity 5.71 (SD = 2.6). They were frightened, and they had a good time.

What "the sweet spot" actually means

The key result is not "fear is fun." It is that the relationship between the two bends.

When the researchers looked at ratings tied to specific locations inside the house, they found a significant quadratic relationship between enjoyment and self-reported fear (β = −0.05, p = .014). A quadratic term is the statistical signature of a curve rather than a straight line, and a negative one describes a hill: up, over the top, back down.

Andersen put it plainly in the university's announcement of the paper: "If people are not very scared, they do not enjoy the attraction as much, and the same happens if they are too scared." And: "Instead, it seems to be the case that a 'just-right' amount of fear is central for maximizing enjoyment."

The heart-rate data pointed the same way from a different angle. Large-scale fluctuations in heart rate — the big, slow swings — tracked self-reported fright in a straight line (β = 0.20, p = .001): the more the body swung, the more frightened people said they were. But small-scale fluctuations, the fine-grained jitter, showed the inverted U against enjoyment (β = −275.07, p = .009). Enjoyment was linked to arousal dynamics that were, in the authors' phrase, "just right" — not maximal.

Fear and fun are not the same dial. You can crank fear arbitrarily high. Fun has a ceiling, and past it the line goes down.

Why the same film is a great night for one person and a bad one for another


If everyone has a sweet spot, the differences between people are differences in position and width. Two strands of research help describe that spread without claiming to explain any individual.

Morbid curiosity. In 2021, Coltan Scrivner published a validation of the Morbid Curiosity Scale in Personality and Individual Differences (volume 183, article 111139), across four samples of 385, 330, 317 and 137 participants. The scale breaks the trait into four factors: minds of dangerous people, paranormal danger, body violation, and interpersonal violence. Self-reported horror media use correlated with overall morbid curiosity at r = 0.56, and in one study trait morbid curiosity predicted horror fandom (β = 0.48, p < 0.001). Men in those samples scored higher on average than women (r = −0.35 between sex and the total score in study two). Group averages are not forecasts about a person, and the scale measures interest, not character.

Practice, or at least its correlates. The same year, Scrivner, John A. Johnson, Jens Kjeldgaard-Christiansen and Mathias Clasen surveyed 310 people during the COVID-19 pandemic for a paper in Personality and Individual Differences (volume 168, article 110397). Horror fans and people high in morbid curiosity reported greater psychological resilience at that time, and fans of "prepper" genres — zombie, apocalyptic, alien-invasion — reported both more resilience and more preparedness. That is a cross-sectional correlation in one pandemic-era sample. It does not show that watching horror makes anyone more resilient, and it says nothing diagnostic about people who cannot stand the genre.

What it does support is a hypothesis the Recreational Fear Lab at Aarhus University has been testing since: frightening fiction gives people somewhere to rehearse threat at a scale they control.


Horror is the one genre people actively hate

The individual-differences picture has a blunt population-level echo: horror is the genre that splits the room.

YouGov polling of US adults published in October 2025 found that of the genres tested, horror had the smallest share who collectively love or like it (50%) and the largest share who hate or dislike it (46%). The hate figure is the striking one: 22% said they hate horror, three times the share who said the same about each of the next most hated genres — Western, fantasy and science fiction — each hated by 7%. A YouGov poll three years earlier found the same shape: 23% hating horror, against 9% each for Western, science fiction and romance.

Caption: Share of US adults who say they hate each film genre, October 2025. Horror is hated by three times as many people as the next most-hated genres. Source: YouGov, "The horror divide: Americans' love-hate relationship with scary movies", 16 October 2025.

One plausible reading: horror is the mainstream genre whose product is a physiological state rather than a story shape, so it is the one where "I don't like it" most often means "my body doesn't like it." Either way, disliking horror is a common preference, not a deficit.


A practical way to find your own band

None of the research above prescribes anything. But the sweet-spot model suggests a way to run the experiment on yourself, and a way to bail out without wrecking the evening for anyone else.

1. Pick the mildest thing that still counts. YouGov's 2025 polling found that comedic horror and psychological horror drew the largest shares saying they love or like them (60% each), while torture films drew the smallest (22%). Start where the crowd starts.

2. Choose your company deliberately. Among people who watch horror, 47% said they prefer to watch with other people and only 17% prefer to watch alone. Having someone to look at is part of the format, not a weakness in it.

3. Control the lighting. Among horror watchers, three times as many prefer watching at night (44%) as during the day (14%). If you want it milder, invert that.

4. Set an exit before you start. Agree out loud that anyone can pause, step out or turn the lights on, with no negotiation. A protected exit keeps a frightening thing on the enjoyable side of the curve.

5. Notice where the line turned. If the evening stopped being fun, ask what changed at that moment — the volume, the realism, the helplessness, the length. The sweet spot is defined by its edges.

6. Take the down-slope seriously. If nothing on the mild end is tolerable, that is information, not a challenge.


What this research does not say

It does not say horror is good for you, or that avoiding it is a symptom of anything. The haunted-house study measured a curve in 92 people's physiology and self-reports. The pandemic study found a correlation in a survey. The polling measures taste. None of it says your taste in horror reveals anything about your mental health. If frightening media leaves you distressed in a way that lingers, that is worth raising with a professional — not because of the films, but because lingering distress deserves attention on its own terms.


Take the quiz

Curious where your own band sits? We built a seven-question quiz that maps how you respond to controlled fear — what pulls you in, what pushes you out, and where your line tends to fall. It takes two minutes, collects nothing, and describes your pattern in plain English rather than handing you a label.

Frequently asked questions

Why do some people enjoy being scared while others hate it?

The Aarhus field study suggests almost everyone enjoys fear only within a band — enjoyment rose with fear and then fell again, producing an inverted-U curve. What varies between people is where that band sits and how wide it is. Trait research on morbid curiosity finds that interest in threatening subject matter differs substantially between individuals and correlates with horror media use. So the horror fan is not enjoying more fear without limit; their limit is simply somewhere else.

Is there real evidence for the "sweet spot", or is it just a nice phrase?

There is measured evidence, though from one study at one attraction. Andersen and colleagues found a statistically significant quadratic relationship between self-reported enjoyment and self-reported fear (β = −0.05, p = .014), and an inverted-U relationship between enjoyment and small-scale heart-rate fluctuations (β = −275.07, p = .009). That is a curve, not a slope. It has not yet been replicated across many attractions and cultures.

Does watching horror films make you more resilient?

No study has shown that. A 2021 survey of 310 people during the COVID-19 pandemic found that horror fans and morbidly curious people reported greater psychological resilience at that time. That is a correlation measured at one moment, so it cannot establish that horror caused the resilience — people who cope well may simply be more willing to watch frightening things in the first place.

Are men more likely to enjoy horror than women?

Polling and trait research both report average differences in that direction, and in the haunted-house sample women reported lower enjoyment than men (β = −1.86, p = .001). But these are group averages with enormous overlap, and they describe the samples studied, not a rule about anyone. Plenty of women are horror devotees and plenty of men avoid the genre entirely. Mind Decoded treats averages as descriptions of distributions, never as predictions about a reader.

Why do jump scares work even when you can see them coming?

The Aarhus team filmed participants at three predetermined jump-scare points and had independent raters code the footage. Coder-perceived surprise predicted both fear and enjoyment. Anticipation appears to be part of the product rather than a spoiler for it — knowing roughly when something is coming without knowing exactly what keeps arousal moving, which is the raw material the curve is built from.

Is it a bad sign if I have to stop a horror film halfway through?

It is a preference, not a sign. Roughly a fifth to a quarter of US adults in YouGov's polling say outright that they hate the genre, and half say they do not like it. Stopping is also exactly what the sweet-spot model predicts a person will do once the curve turns down — leaving is the mechanism working, not failing.

What is "recreational fear" as researchers use the term?

It is the term the Recreational Fear Lab at Aarhus University's School of Communication and Culture uses for frightening activity people deliberately seek out — horror films, haunted attractions, play-chasing, ghost stories. The lab, directed by Marc Malmdorf Andersen and Mathias Clasen, studies the conditions under which fear becomes enjoyable, social and meaningful rather than simply aversive.

Connect

Questions or thoughts? Reach out anytime.

Email

subscribe to our newsletter

hello@minddecoded.com

© 2026. All rights reserved.